Naturally, this means I'm looking at Genesis (and Matthew, when doing NT readings), and I have again been struck at the types of Christ that we see in the first few chapters. I mentioned these in some post awhile ago, but these are the ones I've identified so far:
- Adam as a type of Christ and Eve as a type of the church: when Adam is naming all of the animals, we see that nothing else in creation was sufficient to be his match, and so Eve was specially created not just for Adam, but also from him. In the same way, we were created for and from Christ.
- Adam again, when he chooses Eve over God. We read later that Eve was deceived by the serpent, but Adam ate knowingly, choosing to remain with Eve. In the same way, Christ knowingly chose to become sin on our behalf (2Co 5.21) so that we would be united with him (Ro 6).
- The prophecy of 3.15, while not a type, is nonetheless an important part of the narrative and reinforces our focus on Christ in the opening chapters.
- Finally, the institution of blood sacrifices is apropos. When Adam and Eve realize their nakedness (often taken as a symbol of sinfulness; compare to Revelation, the parable in Matthew of the wedding, and so on), they sew their own coverings, which nicely (and properly, I think) symbolizes our own efforts to cover up our sin. But when God throws them out of the garden, he kills two animals and clothes them in animal skin. We see that blood must be shed, first, and second, that God must do it. While this particular type probably doesn't have the "legs" of the others, it's nonetheless a poignant reminder of the death of the innocent in place of the guilty.
I've also tried to pay attention to the narrative a bit more as I've gone through here, in the sense that I've tried to see what the point is behind the story.
The murder of Abel is recorded in part to illustrate (as we read later in I John) the conflict between the righteous and unrighteous, and, I think, Satan's efforts to prevent the prophecy of 3.15 from coming to pass.
In that same vein, I think it's conceivable to view the events of 6.2 as Satan's effort to corrupt the human race. We certainly skip a lot of historical data when reading through Adam's genealogy, but in terms of the plot, we're really looking at how we got to the Flood. Noah survives, I think, not because he is somehow different than everyone else spiritually (I include him in the damning indictment of 6.9), but because God had preserved him in some fashion from the corrupting influences mentioned in the beginning of the chapter.
This is about as far as I've made it so far, but it's been profitable, both in review and in identifying some themes that I'll be looking for throughout the OT.